Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-update-05

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-update
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-04-03
Requested 2024-03-20
Authors himanshu sharma
I-D last updated 2024-04-03
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -07 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -06 by Jim Fenton (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Susan Hares (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -04 by Jim Fenton (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Ines Robles (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ines Robles
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-update by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-04-03
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-update-05
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2024-04-03
IETF LC End Date: 2024-04-03
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat


This document updates the maximum allowed length of Nonce to 128 octets for the
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP). OCSP is used for checking the status
of a certificate, and the Nonce extension is used to cryptographically bind an
OCSP response message to a particular OCSP request message. This document also
modifies Nonce section to clearly define the encoding format and values
distinctively for an easier implementation and understanding. This document
obsoletes RFC 8954 and provides updated ASN.1 modules for OCSP, updates RFC

The document is well written and easy to read.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: None

Thanks for this document,