IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-private-key-stmt-attr-06
review-ietf-lamps-private-key-stmt-attr-06-artart-lc-gondwana-2025-06-13-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lamps-private-key-stmt-attr |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-06-22 | |
| Requested | 2025-05-19 | |
| Authors | Russ Housley | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-12 (Latest revision 2025-06-26) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Bron Gondwana
(diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Adrian Farrel (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Roni Even (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Bron Gondwana |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-private-key-stmt-attr by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/buLBuHehC6KsKofKQK7vTgzzoBc | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-06-13 |
review-ietf-lamps-private-key-stmt-attr-06-artart-lc-gondwana-2025-06-13-00
I am the ARTART reviewer for this document. Thanks for writing it, it's generally clear. If I was to give any nit, it is that the "Introduction" seems quite long including detailing a 6 step process - something I would have expected to see under its own heading. I expect that if I had an existing implementation of ASN.1 and certificate generation, it would be trivial to add this property. Likewise if I needed to use it, I would know what values to fill in and what my CA was expecting.