Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-05-08
Requested 2019-04-24
Authors Phillip Hallam-Baker , Rob Stradling , Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
I-D last updated 2019-05-29
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Stefan Santesson (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Qin Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stefan Santesson
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-05-29
This document is well written and in general I do not have any comment on the
content beyond the previous reviews.

One thing do come to my mind though.
A common aspect of standards documents is that they only are relevant to those
who declare compliance to the standard. This document is different as it relies
on that all parties (CA:s) are aware of this standard and performs the
stipulated checks.

In the end I assume that this may affect relying parties and how they determine
wether a particular certificate is valid, even if that is not the intention of
this standard. I sort of miss a discussion on this in the security
considerations section.

But that is nothing that should prevent this document from being accepted.