IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lisp-geo-13
review-ietf-lisp-geo-13-genart-lc-korhonen-2025-05-12-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lisp-geo |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-05-07 | |
| Requested | 2025-04-23 | |
| Authors | Dino Farinacci | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-02-18 (Latest revision 2026-02-18) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -09
by Ines Robles
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Prachi Jain (diff) Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Yingzhen Qu (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Tim Wicinski (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lisp-geo by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/HGohTgiA-rXjkOJux28epn7BupM | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2025-05-12 |
review-ietf-lisp-geo-13-genart-lc-korhonen-2025-05-12-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-lisp-geo-?? Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2025-05-12 IETF LC End Date: 2025-05-07 IESG Telechat date: 2025-06-05 Summary: The document is ready with few editorial nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: - Section 4.2 lines 243-244 mentions base stations. I do not understand what it means in this context. How does a base station in this paragraph relate to a WiFi AP? Nits/editorial comments: - Section 4.2 paragraph starting line 236 discusses about WiFi access-points and later in the same paragraph uses the acronym AP (line 243) without first defining it. - Section 8 line 408 uses square brackets around where I think normal parentheses should be used (ref. "[see Security Considerations section]").