Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
review-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10-intdir-telechat-jiang-2023-02-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2023-02-12
Requested 2023-02-01
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Alberto Rodriguez-Natal , Vina Ermagan , Albert Cabellos-Aparicio , Sharon Barkai , Mohamed Boucadair
I-D last updated 2023-02-09
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -06 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -10 by Mike McBride (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Al Morton (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Roni Even (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -10 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -10 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sheng Jiang
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/X_eUM6lUSe1W68Tvg6_FG4UHH3I
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-02-09
review-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10-intdir-telechat-jiang-2023-02-09-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the IntArea directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments that
are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG
review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like
any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review Date: 2023-02-10
Result: Ready

This Standards Track document specifies an extension to the request/reply based 
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) control plane to enable Publish/Subscribe 
(PubSub) operation. It largely depends on RFC 9301. This document is well-written
clearly define the newly increased field and the relevant behaviors. It is READY
for publication from the INT area perspective. I do notice there are still security
issues from other reviewers. They should be proper addressed before publication. 
I would leave it to them.