Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-14
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-14-rtgdir-lc-drake-2018-08-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 28)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-08-17
Requested 2018-07-31
Requested by Deborah Brungard
Authors Dino Farinacci, Vince Fuller, David Meyer, Darrel Lewis, Albert Cabellos-Aparicio
Draft last updated 2018-08-12
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -14 by John Drake (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott Bradner (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -15 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -19 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Comments
Prep for IETF Last Call
Assignment Reviewer John Drake
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-14-rtgdir-lc-drake-2018-08-12
Reviewed rev. 14 (document currently at 28)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-08-12

Review
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-14-rtgdir-lc-drake-2018-08-12

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ‚Äčhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-14.txt
Reviewer: your-name
Review Date: 
IETF LC End Date: 17-Aug-2018
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:

    No issues found. This document is ready for publication.
    
Comments:

    The document is clear, concise, and comprehensive.

 Major Issues:

  No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

  No minor issues found. 

Yours Irrespectively,

John