Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-18
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-18-secdir-telechat-rose-2018-09-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 38)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-09-25
Requested 2018-09-11
Authors Dino Farinacci , Vince Fuller , David Meyer , Darrel Lewis , Albert Cabellos-Aparicio
I-D last updated 2018-09-20
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -14 by John Drake (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -15 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -19 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Kyle Rose
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 38)
Result Has issues
Completed 2018-09-20
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-18-secdir-telechat-rose-2018-09-20-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

I have reviewed the -15/-18 diff and found no changes relevant to the points I
raised in the first review and its subsequent discussion. I maintain that some
reorganization is warranted to clarify the intended security properties of the
system, especially given the complexity of the overall LISP ecosystem and the
choice to move documents separately, complicating the realistic need to review
them as a block. Otherwise, I have nothing further to add.