Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lmap-framework-11
review-ietf-lmap-framework-11-opsdir-lc-banks-2015-04-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lmap-framework |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-04-07 | |
| Requested | 2015-03-01 | |
| Authors | Philip Eardley , Al Morton , Marcelo Bagnulo , Trevor Burbridge , Paul Aitken , Aamer Akhter | |
| Draft last updated | 2015-04-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -11
by
Tom Taylor
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -08 by Radia Perlman (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Radia Perlman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Sarah Banks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sarah Banks |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-lmap-framework-11-opsdir-lc-banks-2015-04-09
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Has Issues | |
| Completed | 2015-04-09 |
review-ietf-lmap-framework-11-opsdir-lc-banks-2015-04-09-00
Hello,
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the
operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed
in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like
any other last call comments.
First, a big thanks to the authors for a decently-sized Security and
Privacy Considerations section. I certainly found myself wanting to ask
a lot of questions as I read through this, and these two aforementioned
sections did a decent job of running through the considerations.
I did, however, find the lack of normative language distracting,
particularly in the face of the considerable security/privacy
considerations conversation. If security and privacy are a base
requirement, why is there no normative language to that end? As
written, it seems completely wide open to the implementation - and
maybe this is true even if there is normative language), and I think
the document would be well served to consider modification to include
normative language.
Regards,
Sarah