Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12

Request Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2020-02-20
Requested 2020-02-06
Authors Ana Minaburo, Laurent Toutain, Ricardo Andreasen
Draft last updated 2020-02-18
Completed reviews Iotdir Last Call review of -11 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Theresa Enghardt (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Joseph Touch (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2020-02-18
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 12 (document currently at 19)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-02-18


Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors. 
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
The document describes using SCHC Header compression mechanism to compress CoAP headers.  The mechanism is clear. Some Nits:
-  using many acronyms without explaining them, such as MSB, TV used in several places. It would be nicer to expand the acronyms when first use them. 
- Page 4: "... a request may contain an Accept option and the response a Content option". Should you add a "... the response contain a Content option"? 

Linda Dunbar