Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-10
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-10-genart-lc-sparks-2020-10-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2020-10-02 | |
| Requested | 2020-09-18 | |
| Authors | Olivier Gimenez , Ivaylo Petrov | |
| I-D last updated | 2020-10-02 | |
| Completed reviews |
Iotdir Telechat review of -10
by Rahul Jadhav
(diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -13 by Ian Swett (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/NxsB3uqDE2XBQ6jDlczppgEAkEQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2020-10-02 |
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-10-genart-lc-sparks-2020-10-02-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-10 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2020-10-02 IETF LC End Date: 2020-10-02 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard but with nits to consider before publication Nits/editorial comments: The abstract says "This is called a profile." It would be better to say something like "This document specifies a profile of RFC8724." What does "other Internet networks" mean? Please replace the phrase with something more descriptive. The word "efficient" in the last sentence of the introduction is puzzling. Could it simply be removed? As the shepherd report notes, there are figures that need to be reworked to satisfy column constraints.