Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-opsdir-lc-banks-2022-09-28-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-10-07 | |
| Requested | 2022-09-23 | |
| Authors | Edgar Ramos , Ana Minaburo | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-09-28 | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Last Call review of -12
by Spencer Dawkins
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Barry Leiba (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Sarah Banks (diff) Iotdir Last Call review of -12 by Mališa Vučinić (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -12 by Johan Stenstam (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sarah Banks |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/7u59EMA5kraHQRKgkVBWNLKW-mM | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-09-28 |
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-12-opsdir-lc-banks-2022-09-28-00
Hi,
The document is well written, and ready to go. This next comment doesn't
specifically represent the OPS area, but my opinion - while it's nice to
see us providing feedback to an SDO, I wonder if this is worth the RFC. As
the document shepherd notes, it was written and reviewed by a very small
group that has deep experience in the WG - the doc really reads to me like
a contribution that could be made to the SDO directly by the authors,
rather than an RFC that says the same thing. I don't gather the impression
that the recommendations here are controversial, or that the IETF itself is
really adding substantive value here. That's simply my feedback though; it
IS well written, and nice to see a fairly thorough and thoughtful document.
Thank you,
Sarah