Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14-genart-lc-shirazipour-2022-07-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-08-02
Requested 2022-07-12
Authors Ana Minaburo , Laurent Toutain
I-D last updated 2022-07-27
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Carl Moberg (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -14 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -15 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -15 by Qin Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/RVzFMuO5DCPzLz7tJnYk9J9NEPk
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 21)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-07-27
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14-genart-lc-shirazipour-2022-07-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2022-07-27
IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-02
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standards Track RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
In Intro section please clarify benefits of this RFC formalizing the
description of the compression rules. :

"The goal of this document is to formalize the description of the rules to
offer" to allow X Y Z ?

Nits/editorial comments:
[Page 3], Section 3, Typo
"options definied"-->"options defined"

[Page 3], Section 3, Typo
"serveur"-->"server"

[Page 6], Section 3.7, Typo
"same enconding."-->"same encoding."

[Page 7], Section 3.10.1, Typo
"unidirectionnal,"--->"unidirectional,"

[Page 10], Section 3.10.5, Typo
"range sould"-->"range should"
"recommandation"-->"recommendation"

[Page 10], Section 3.10.5, Typo
"the the"-->"the"

[Page 10], Section 4, Typo
"idenfied"-->"identified"

[Page 33], Typo x2
"bidirectionnal is forbiden"-->"bidirectional is forbidden"