Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14-genart-lc-shirazipour-2022-07-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 21) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2022-08-02 | |
Requested | 2022-07-12 | |
Authors | Ana Minaburo , Laurent Toutain | |
I-D last updated | 2022-07-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -04
by Carl Moberg
(diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -14 by Joe Clarke (diff) Intdir Last Call review of -15 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Genart Last Call review of -14 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Carl Wallace (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -15 by Qin Wu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/RVzFMuO5DCPzLz7tJnYk9J9NEPk | |
Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 21) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2022-07-27 |
review-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14-genart-lc-shirazipour-2022-07-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-14 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2022-07-27 IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-02 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standards Track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: In Intro section please clarify benefits of this RFC formalizing the description of the compression rules. : "The goal of this document is to formalize the description of the rules to offer" to allow X Y Z ? Nits/editorial comments: [Page 3], Section 3, Typo "options definied"-->"options defined" [Page 3], Section 3, Typo "serveur"-->"server" [Page 6], Section 3.7, Typo "same enconding."-->"same encoding." [Page 7], Section 3.10.1, Typo "unidirectionnal,"--->"unidirectional," [Page 10], Section 3.10.5, Typo "range sould"-->"range should" "recommandation"-->"recommendation" [Page 10], Section 3.10.5, Typo "the the"-->"the" [Page 10], Section 4, Typo "idenfied"-->"identified" [Page 33], Typo x2 "bidirectionnal is forbiden"-->"bidirectional is forbidden"