Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-23
review-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-23-secdir-lc-kaufman-2022-09-29-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 26) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-09-26 | |
Requested | 2022-09-12 | |
Authors | Peter Psenak , Shraddha Hegde , Clarence Filsfils , Ketan Talaulikar , Arkadiy Gulko | |
I-D last updated | 2022-09-29 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -12
by Eric Gray
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -18 by Henning Rogge (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -23 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -23 by Charlie Kaufman (diff) Genart Last Call review of -23 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -25 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Charlie Kaufman |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Kf-P_qedAXneCWO8feUk9VGpeMo | |
Reviewed revision | 23 (document currently at 26) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-09-24 |
review-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-23-secdir-lc-kaufman-2022-09-29-00
Reviewer: Charlie Kaufman Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document primarily concerns the syntax for extensions to the IS-IS and OSPF protocols to carry information about alternative metrics and constraints on path selection. As described in Security Considerations, there are attacks possible if this new information is corrupted or miscommunicated, but those attacks are addressed in other existing RFCs. --Charlie