Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
review-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03-genart-lc-kyzivat-2018-12-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-12-12
Requested 2018-11-28
Draft last updated 2018-12-09
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Roman Danyliw (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -03 by Yoshifumi Nishida (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Paul Kyzivat
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03-genart-lc-kyzivat-2018-12-09
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-12-09

Review
review-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03-genart-lc-kyzivat-2018-12-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area 
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other 
last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
<‚Äčhttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2018-12-09
IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12
IESG Telechat date: ?

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.

Issues: None

It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 
showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A.

Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is 
problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find 
this the best of bad alternatives.

The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not 
raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and 
this will be fixed by the editor.