Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03
review-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03-genart-lc-kyzivat-2018-12-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2018-12-12 | |
| Requested | 2018-11-28 | |
| Authors | Les Ginsberg , Stefano Previdi , Spencer Giacalone , David Ward , John Drake , Qin Wu | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-12-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -03
by Roman Danyliw
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -03 by Yoshifumi Nishida (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Paul Kyzivat |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2018-12-09 |
review-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03-genart-lc-kyzivat-2018-12-09-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2018-12-09 IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12 IESG Telechat date: ? Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. Issues: None It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A. Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find this the best of bad alternatives. The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and this will be fixed by the editor.