Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01
review-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-06-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-06-24
Requested 2024-06-10
Authors Tony Li
I-D last updated 2024-06-19
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -01 by Andrew Alston (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Susan Hares (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Ines Robles (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris M. Lonvick
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/BIcSHOO_B9Xn_xBYlVphjWXH6OU
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 03)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-06-19
review-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-06-19-00
Hello,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

The summary of the review is READY.

As is stated in the draft, "This document changes the registration procedure
for that registry from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review"." and the Security
Considerations section states, "This document does not affect the security
issues discussed in RFC 5029." I agree with the latter and the former seems
appropriate.

I found no nits in the document.

Best regards,
Chris