Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01
review-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01-genart-lc-sparks-2023-04-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2023-05-03
Requested 2023-04-19
Authors Les Ginsberg , Peter Psenak , Stefano Previdi , Wim Henderickx , John Drake
I-D last updated 2023-10-10 (Latest revision 2023-05-25)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -01 by Joseph Yee (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -01 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/LIVh0a3mn2tp9mWYXQ0QV8wgziA
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2023-04-27
review-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01-genart-lc-sparks-2023-04-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2023-04-27
IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-03
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
Ready for publication as a proposed standard rfc but with nits to consider
before publication.

Nits:
1) It would be nice to explain when/how the registries got renamed?

2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the
shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs can
do this). Otherwise it adds to the list of URLs that we have to keep alive
forever.