Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01
review-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01-rtgdir-lc-richardson-2020-12-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2020-12-18 | |
| Requested | 2020-11-30 | |
| Requested by | Acee Lindem | |
| Authors | Christian Hopps | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-10-19 (Latest revision 2022-01-01) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -01
by Ladislav Lhotka
(diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Michael Richardson (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Michael Richardson |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric by Routing Area Directorate Withdrawn | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/O-SiwBjlcDrTFWymBFEU33GHpHk | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2020-12-06 |
review-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01-rtgdir-lc-richardson-2020-12-06-00
This document is a short YANG module relating to RFC8500, and expertise in that RFC are required to be sure if all the right control bits are required. It has reasonable security consideration, although the words, "The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer" seems a bit awkward. I would instead write, "All [NETCONF] transactions run over a secure transport layer, which is SSH"...