Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01
review-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01-rtgdir-lc-richardson-2020-12-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2020-12-18 | |
| Requested | 2020-11-30 | |
| Requested by | Acee Lindem | |
| Authors | Christian Hopps | |
| I-D last updated | 2020-12-06 | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -01
by Ladislav Lhotka
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -01 by Michael Richardson (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Michael Richardson |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01-rtgdir-lc-richardson-2020-12-06
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/O-SiwBjlcDrTFWymBFEU33GHpHk | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2020-12-06 |
review-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01-rtgdir-lc-richardson-2020-12-06-00
This document is a short YANG module relating to RFC8500, and expertise in that RFC are required to be sure if all the right control bits are required. It has reasonable security consideration, although the words, "The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer" seems a bit awkward. I would instead write, "All [NETCONF] transactions run over a secure transport layer, which is SSH"...