Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-
review-ietf-ltru-4645bis-secdir-lc-turner-2009-04-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2009-04-24 | |
Requested | 2009-04-16 | |
Authors | Doug Ewell | |
I-D last updated | 2009-04-24 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -??
by Sean Turner
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sean Turner |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-ltru-4645bis-secdir-lc-turner-2009-04-24
|
|
Completed | 2009-04-24 |
review-ietf-ltru-4645bis-secdir-lc-turner-2009-04-24-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. My heart sank when I was assigned this document because it's 950 pages, but 940ish of the pages are a registry ;) This document provides procedures to update the IANA Language Subtag Registry. The Subtags are copied from ISO documents. I can't think of any security concerns for the procedures themselves. The Security Considerations section points to draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21.txt for any issue with tags themselves. Assuming the copy from the ISO document was exact, I support this document becoming an RFC spt