Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11
review-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11-iotdir-telechat-robles-2020-10-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2020-10-20
Requested 2020-10-09
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Carles Gomez, Jon Crowcroft, Michael Scharf
Draft last updated 2020-10-20
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -11 by Bernie Volz (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -11 by Ines Robles (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -11 by Mirja Kühlewind (diff)
Comments
I would appreciate a review on this 30-page document keeping in mind the specific of IoT but also the full (if possible) compliance to TCP/IP.
Thank you,
-éric
Assignment Reviewer Ines Robles 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11-iotdir-telechat-robles-2020-10-20
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/vKP5b_jsrfi2ndZxHYZGNvD6w6I
Reviewed rev. 11 (document currently at 13)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-10-20

Review
review-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11-iotdir-telechat-robles-2020-10-20

Document: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2020-10-20

Summary:

This document provides guidance on how to implement and use the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) in Constrained-Node Networks  (CNNs), which are a characterstic of the Internet of Things (IoT).

The document is clear to understand. 

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None.

Nits: 
1- Should section 2 "Conventions used in this document" be removed? I have not found Normative language into the document
2- Questions: Following my understanding, the transport features provided by TCP [RFC 8095 - Section 3.1.3] are covered in this document, right? or there some of the mentioned features that does not apply to CNN?

Thank you for this document,

Ines