Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-04
review-ietf-lwig-terminology-04-secdir-lc-laurie-2013-05-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lwig-terminology |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-06-05 | |
| Requested | 2013-05-23 | |
| Authors | Carsten Bormann , Mehmet Ersue , Ari Keränen | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-02-10) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -04
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Suresh Krishnan (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Ben Laurie (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Laurie |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lwig-terminology by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2013-05-30 |
review-ietf-lwig-terminology-04-secdir-lc-laurie-2013-05-30-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Status: Ready with nits. This document discusses networks comprised of constrained nodes (i.e. nodes with limited power, CPU, storage, etc.). It does cover whether various classes of nodes can participate in secure networks, which is good, but the Security Considerations section is empty - I would suggest that this section could usefully contain a summary of the security implications of the various constraints discussed.