Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-01
review-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-01-secdir-lc-emery-2015-05-15-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-05-12 | |
Requested | 2015-04-23 | |
Authors | Christopher Dearlove , Thomas H. Clausen | |
I-D last updated | 2015-05-15 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -01
by Shawn M Emery
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Tim Chown (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Shawn M Emery |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2015-05-15 |
review-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-01-secdir-lc-emery-2015-05-15-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft provides nomenclature of types and type extensions used by Mobile Ad hoc Networking's (MANET) Packet, Message, and Address Blocks. The draft also specifies a corresponding IANA registry for these types. The security considerations section does exist and discloses that the draft does not impose any security considerations in itself. I agree with this assertion. General comments: None. Editorial comments: s/consisteng/consistent/ Shawn. --