Last Call Review of draft-ietf-marf-as-
review-ietf-marf-as-secdir-lc-kelly-2012-04-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-marf-as |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2012-04-24 | |
| Requested | 2012-04-11 | |
| Authors | J.D. Falk , Murray Kucherawy | |
| I-D last updated | 2012-04-26 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Martin Thomson
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Martin Thomson Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Scott G. Kelly |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott G. Kelly |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-marf-as by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Completed | 2012-04-26 |
review-ietf-marf-as-secdir-lc-kelly-2012-04-26-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) is used to report email abuse feedback between email operators, or from email operators to end user network access operators. This document is an applicability statement for using the ARF in these two contexts. The security considerations section refers the reader to the security considerations discussions in RFCs 5965 and 6449, but also contains a detailed discussion of various concerns. I see no security issues with this document.