Last Call Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-
review-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-genart-lc-gurbani-2012-03-14-00

Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Title Last Call Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-
Request Last Call - requested 2012-03-01
Reviewer Vijay Gurbani
Posted at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg07291.html
Last updated 2012-03-14

Review
review-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-genart-lc-gurbani-2012-03-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-10
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Mar-21-2012
IETF LC End Date: Mar-14-2012
IESG Telechat date: March-15-2012 (*** Sorry for the delay ***)

Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: 0
Minor issues: 0
Nits/editorial comments: 1

Nits:

- The referencing in this document seems odd.  For example, normal
 referencing would be:

    As required by IANA [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], ...

 Here, the reference object is "IANA" and the reference is
 "IANA-CONSIDERATIONS".  xml2rfc creates a link from "IANA-
 CONSIDERATIONS" to the References section.

 However, this draft uses referencing as follows:

    As required by [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], ...

 This essentially conflates the reference object ("IANA") with
 the reference itself ("IANA-CONSIDERATIONS").

 I suspect that this is a stylistic convention used by the authors,
 so if they are happy with it then they can feel free to disregard
 this comment.

Thanks,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg at {bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani at alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   

http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/