Last Call Review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08
review-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08-genart-lc-gurbani-2023-03-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2023-03-15
Requested 2023-03-01
Authors Tommy Pauly , David Schinazi , Alex Chernyakhovsky , Mirja Kühlewind , Magnus Westerlund
I-D last updated 2023-03-03
Completed reviews Dnsdir Telechat review of -09 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Intdir Early review of -07 by Timothy Winters (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -08 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -08 by Jean Mahoney (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -08 by Bob Briscoe (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Nancy Cam-Winget (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Timothy Winters (diff)
Httpdir Telechat review of -08 by Mark Nottingham (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -10 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -09 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/xDzbLIml2cnNcLA_g6Sj8YPuQiQ
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-03-03
review-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08-genart-lc-gurbani-2023-03-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2023-03-03
IETF LC End Date: 2023-03-15
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The I-D is ready for moving ahead as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 1

Nits/editorial comments: 0

Minor Issue:
- The I-D alternates between MUST and SHALL, sometimes using both in the same
sentence or paragraph.  Between MUST and SHALL, my advise is to be consistent
and pick one.  All things being equal, MUST is preferable since a neophyte
reader of the I-D, not well versed in IETF ways, can easily understand the
authority behind MUST.