Early Review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02
review-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02-rtgdir-early-drake-2021-05-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2021-06-11
Requested 2021-05-17
Requested by Christopher A. Wood
Authors Alex Chernyakhovsky , Dallas McCall , David Schinazi
I-D last updated 2021-05-26
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -02 by Loganaden Velvindron (diff)
Genart Early review of -02 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Intdir Early review of -02 by Bob Hinden (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by John Drake (diff)
Tsvart Early review of -02 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Comments 
We're requesting early review of a Working Group Supporting Document to improve quality. This document is not meant to be published as an RFC, but we'd like to ensure as wide of a review as possible.
Assignment Reviewer John Drake
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/XDYQR8XWNa8wMzRQHOiU1UYcI0Q
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 03)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-05-26
review-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02-rtgdir-early-drake-2021-05-26-00
Hello

I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.
​https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/

The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, perform
an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication to the
IESG. The early review can be performed at any time during the draft’s lifetime
as a working group document. The purpose of this early review is to ensure as
wide of a review as possible

For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Document: draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02.txt
Reviewer: John Drake
Review Date: 26-May-2021
Intended Status: None

Summary:

No issues found.

Comments:

The draft is concise, complete, and well written.

Yours Irrespectively,

John

Juniper Business Use Only