Early Review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02
review-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02-secdir-early-velvindron-2021-05-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-06-11 | |
Requested | 2021-05-17 | |
Requested by | Christopher A. Wood | |
Authors | Alex Chernyakhovsky , Dallas McCall , David Schinazi | |
I-D last updated | 2021-05-24 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -02
by Loganaden Velvindron
(diff)
Genart Early review of -02 by Robert Sparks (diff) Intdir Early review of -02 by Bob Hinden (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -02 by John Drake (diff) Tsvart Early review of -02 by Kyle Rose (diff) |
|
Comments |
We're requesting early review of a Working Group Supporting Document to improve quality. This document is not meant to be published as an RFC, but we'd like to ensure as wide of a review as possible. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Loganaden Velvindron |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yJQB1u1RvMQDFYdCwQWG0ao9J54 | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2021-05-24 |
review-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02-secdir-early-velvindron-2021-05-24-00
I'm reviewing the document as part of the Security Directorate (SECDIR). -Wireguard is mentioned in section 2.2 but there is no link to the design of the wireguard protocol. -In section 3.9, there are no mention of techniques such as padding to mitigate the impact of traffic analysis. My understanding is that this is out of scope of the current Internet Draft.