Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-02

Request Review of draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Early Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-06-11
Requested 2021-05-17
Requested by Christopher A. Wood
Authors Alex Chernyakhovsky , Dallas McCall , David Schinazi
I-D last updated 2021-05-24
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -02 by Loganaden Velvindron (diff)
Genart Early review of -02 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Intdir Early review of -02 by Bob Hinden (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by John Drake (diff)
Tsvart Early review of -02 by Kyle Rose (diff)
We're requesting early review of a Working Group Supporting Document to improve quality. This document is not meant to be published as an RFC, but we'd like to ensure as wide of a review as possible.
Assignment Reviewer Loganaden Velvindron
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 03)
Result Has nits
Completed 2021-05-24
I'm reviewing the document as part of the Security Directorate (SECDIR). 

-Wireguard is mentioned in section 2.2 but there is no link to the design of
the wireguard protocol.

-In section 3.9, there are no mention of techniques such as padding to mitigate
the impact of traffic analysis. My understanding is that this is out of scope of the current
Internet Draft.