IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-07
review-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-07-genart-lc-sarikaya-2026-04-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-04-08
Requested 2026-03-25
Authors Yisong Liu , Changwang Lin , Zheng Zhang , Xuesong Geng , Vinod Kumar Nagaraj
I-D last updated 2026-05-08 (Latest revision 2026-04-17)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Robert Wills (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Michael P (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -06 by Robert Wills (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Mike Ounsworth (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by David Blacka (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/G0NOVp12PZ7DSMQwsZQbC_1WJJw
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-04-08
review-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-07-genart-lc-sarikaya-2026-04-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-??
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2026-04-08
IETF LC End Date: 2026-04-08
IESG Telechat date: 2026-04-16

Summary:
The document develops YANG model for AMT for delivering multicast traffic from
   sources in a multicast-enabled network to receivers that lack
   multicast connectivity to the source network
Major issues:None

Minor issues:None

Nits/editorial comments:
The document is well written. YANG model has been checked by a YANG doctor in
two versions and found to be OK. A small nit here we suggest specifying YANG
version in the two RFCs cited: Sec. 2.2 The terminology for describing YANG
data models is found in [RFC6020] which defines YANG version 1
   and [RFC7950] which defines YANG version 1.1, including ...