Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-
review-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-secdir-lc-lonvick-2012-04-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2012-05-06
Requested 2012-04-22
Authors Stig Venaas, Rishabh Parekh, Gunter Van de Velde, Tim Chown, Marshall Eubanks
Draft last updated 2012-04-26
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Roni Even
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Chris Lonvick
Assignment Reviewer Chris Lonvick
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-secdir-lc-lonvick-2012-04-26
Review completed: 2012-04-26

Review
review-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-secdir-lc-lonvick-2012-04-26

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.



Well, this is pretty straightforward.  The document explains that it is 


requesting addresses to be set aside for examples in the documentation of 


multicast.  It goes through each case and lists the addresses that are to 


be used.






I find the document to be well written and to the point.  The security 


considerations section is appropriate and consistent with other IETF 


documents requesting namespace for documentation purposes.




Regards,
Chris