Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-

Request Review of draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2010-05-04
Requested 2010-04-19
Authors Nicolas Montavont , George Tsirtsis , Koojana Kuladinithi , Gerardo Giaretta , Hesham Soliman
I-D last updated 2010-05-11
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU)
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU)
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mext-flow-binding-secdir-lc-tsou-2010-05-11
Completed 2010-05-11


I have reviewed this document as part of the security 
directorate's ongoing

effort to review all IETF documents being processed by 
the IESG.  These

comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area

directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just

like any other last call comments.

Some of my comments are following.


Comment 1:

The title of this document focuses on flow 
binding in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO, However it is not clear how flow binding is 
supported in the NEMO? Is the mobile router operation in NEMO same as mobile 
node operation in Mobile IPv6?

Comment 2:

Is flow summary mobility option is one 
sub-option of Flow Identification Mobility Option or one independent new 
mobility option? 


Comment 3:

Should the HA, CN and MAP all support this 
specification? If HA does not support, how to direct inbound flows to 
specific addresses since one or more flows may bind to a care-of 



B. R.