Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10
review-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10-genart-lc-shirazipour-2017-08-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-08-25
Requested 2017-08-11
Authors Panos Kampanakis , Mio Suzuki
I-D last updated 2017-08-31
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Qin Wu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2017-08-31
review-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10-genart-lc-shirazipour-2017-08-31-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2017-08-22
IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-25
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-31

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC but I have
comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 3], "should chose"---->"should choose"
-[Page 4], "language an the"---->"language and the"
-[Page 5], "that an successful"---->"that a successful"
-[Page 6], "can cary greatly"---->"can caryy greatly"
-[Page 8], "excercise"---->"exercise"
-[Page 8],"compteting"---->"competing"

Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com