Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-12

Request Review of draft-ietf-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-05-25
Requested 2015-05-14
Authors Sri Gundavelli , Kent Leung , George Tsirtsis , Alexandre Petrescu
Draft last updated 2015-05-28
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -12 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jürgen Schönwälder
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-12-opsdir-lc-schoenwaelder-2015-05-28
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-05-28

I have reviewed draft-ietf-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support-12.txt as part
of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF
documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written
with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF
drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I see no problem with publishing this I-D as Experimental RFCs hence
give it a 'Ready'. That said, it would have been nice if the document
would indicate whether the extension impacts any of the MIB modules,
namely the MIP-MIB [RFC2006] and the MOBILEIPV6-MIB [RFC4295]. It
could be that the MIB tables simply work for multiple registrations
over multiple interfaces. Anyway, since this I-D is submitted for
publication as Experimental, I do not consider this necessary to
address at this point in time (just nice to have).


Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <