Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-haaro-
review-ietf-mip4-nemo-haaro-genart-telechat-even-2011-11-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-haaro
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2011-11-01
Requested 2011-11-01
Draft last updated 2011-11-12
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -?? by Roni Even
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mip4-nemo-haaro-genart-telechat-even-2011-11-12
Review completed: 2011-11-12

Review
review-ietf-mip4-nemo-haaro-genart-telechat-even-2011-11-12

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: 

draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-haaro-06

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date: 2011–10–29

IETF LC End Date: 2011–10–31

IESG Telechat date: 2011-11-3

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an experimental RFC.  

 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

1.

       

The IANA section is not clear. It talks about three new tables but it was not clear to me which one they were and what is the extension policy for the tables.

2.

       

Section 4.2 talks about realm compression. Is it always used when using prefix compression or can you just do prefix compression is there is no benefit from using the realm compression since it is a bit complicated.

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:  

 

1.

       

Section 3.1 first paragraph 

“

alredy”

2.

       

Section 3.3.1 “only be when” change to “only when” and “and and whose” delete one of the “and”.