Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27
review-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27-genart-telechat-kyzivat-2017-07-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 28)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-08-15
Requested 2017-07-25
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -22 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -22 by Rich Salz (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -22 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -26 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -28 by Rich Salz
Genart Telechat review of -28 by Paul Kyzivat
Review State Completed
Reviewer Paul Kyzivat
Review review-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27-genart-telechat-kyzivat-2017-07-27
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ijAxdUypnpcQml0dS2t8p8znzAE
Reviewed rev. 27 (document currently at 28)
Review result Ready with Nits
Last updated 2017-07-27

Review
review-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27-genart-telechat-kyzivat-2017-07-27

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area 
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document 
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more 
information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2017-07-07
IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-24
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-15

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should 
be fixed before publication.

(These nits were reported by IdNits. I apologize for not noticing these 
during my Last Call review.)

Issues:

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  2

(1) NIT: Unused Reference: 'RFC5245' is defined on line 1065, but no 
explicit reference was found in the text

This is now redundant because all the references in the text have been 
changed to draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis.

(2) NIT: Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4572

This is now obsolete because it has been replaced by RFC8122. This draft 
should now be referencing that.