Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-36
review-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-36-genart-lc-bryant-2019-06-17-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 39)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-06-20
Requested 2019-06-06
Draft last updated 2019-06-17
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -36 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-36-genart-lc-bryant-2019-06-17
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/EUZi5n-YVY-VD2MMb7ddy4CdXkQ
Reviewed rev. 36 (document currently at 39)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2019-06-17

Review
review-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-36-genart-lc-bryant-2019-06-17

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-36
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2019-06-17
IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-20
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This is very much a review by a non-specialist. The document is well written, but has a small number of nits that need looking at before publication.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

ID-Nits points out the following:
  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4091
     (Obsoleted by RFC 5245)
  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4092
     (Obsoleted by RFC 5245)
From the text it looks like the updated RFC should be the reference that this memo uses.

====
The following abbreviations are not in the RFC Editor's well known list and should be expanded on first use:
    STUN
    SDP
    FQDN
    PSTN