Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-06
review-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-06-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2016-03-18-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-03-15 | |
Requested | 2016-03-10 | |
Authors | Suhas Nandakumar | |
I-D last updated | 2016-03-18 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Meral Shirazipour Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Adam W. Montville (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Sarah Banks (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-03-18 |
review-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-06-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2016-03-18-00
Hello Jari The suggested changes were made and reviewed by AD and the chairs Thanks Suhas Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:35 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote: > > Thanks for the review, Meral!! > > Authors, have you see the suggested editorial changes? Wanted to make sure they are not missed. > > Jari > >> On 22 Feb 2016, at 20:19, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour at ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05 >> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >> Review Date: 2016-02-22 >> IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-26 >> IESG Telechat date: NA >> >> Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments. >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> -[Page 2,3], please spell out RTP, SDP, AVPF at first use. >> -[Page 2] "simulation data" is listed as real time along with audio, video. I suggest removing it and putting "time critical application" if that is what we want to convey. >> -[Page 5], Section 5, "in the Section 3"---->"in Section 3" >> >> Best regards, >> Meral >> --- >> Meral Shirazipour >> Ericsson >> Research >> www.ericsson.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art at ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >