Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-06
review-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-06-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2016-03-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-03-15
Requested 2016-03-10
Authors Suhas Nandakumar
I-D last updated 2016-03-18
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Meral Shirazipour
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 06
Result Ready
Completed 2016-03-18
review-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-06-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2016-03-18-00
Hello Jari

   The suggested changes were made and reviewed by AD and the chairs

Thanks
Suhas

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:35 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review, Meral!!
>
> Authors, have you see the suggested editorial changes? Wanted to make sure
they are not missed. > > Jari > >> On 22 Feb 2016, at 20:19, Meral Shirazipour
<meral.shirazipour at ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART
reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all
IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat
these comments just like any other last call comments. >> >> For more
information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document:
draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05 >> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >>
Review Date: 2016-02-22 >> IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-26 >> IESG Telechat date:
NA >> >> Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC
but I have some comments. >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >>
Nits/editorial comments: >> -[Page 2,3], please spell out RTP, SDP, AVPF at
first use. >> -[Page 2] "simulation data" is listed as real time along with
audio, video. I suggest removing it and putting "time critical application" if
that is what we want to convey. >> -[Page 5], Section 5, "in the Section
3"---->"in Section 3" >> >> Best regards, >> Meral >> --- >> Meral Shirazipour
>> Ericsson >> Research >> www.ericsson.com >>
_______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >>
Gen-art at ietf.org >>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

>