Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04
review-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04-secdir-lc-wallace-2013-12-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2013-11-27 | |
Requested | 2013-10-31 | |
Authors | Muthu Arul Perumal , Parthasarathi Ravindran | |
I-D last updated | 2013-12-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Carl Wallace (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Bert Wijnen (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729 by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2013-12-05 |
review-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04-secdir-lc-wallace-2013-12-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document updates RFC 4856 to clarify the behavior when the annexa or annexb parameters to not match in the SDP offer and answer. The document asserts no security considerations beyond those described in RFC 4856 and this seems sufficient.