Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04
review-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04-secdir-lc-wallace-2013-12-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2013-11-27
Requested 2013-10-31
Authors Muthu Perumal, Parthasarathi Ravindran
Draft last updated 2013-12-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Bert Wijnen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carl Wallace 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04-secdir-lc-wallace-2013-12-05
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-12-05

Review
review-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04-secdir-lc-wallace-2013-12-05

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
just like any other last call comments.


The document updates RFC 4856 to clarify the behavior when the annexa or
annexb parameters to not match in the SDP offer and answer.  The document
asserts no security considerations beyond those described in RFC 4856 and
this seems sufficient.