IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13
review-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13-genart-lc-gurbani-2025-11-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-11-28 | |
| Requested | 2025-11-14 | |
| Authors | Lars Eggert , Eliot Lear | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-02-27 (Latest revision 2026-02-09) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14
by Tim Hollebeek
(diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Christian Amsüss (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Michael Scharf (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) Artart Telechat review of -14 by Christian Amsüss (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Vijay K. Gurbani |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wGg0HhUsqH_Fm9MtyJlGM1c3JDI | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2025-11-26 |
review-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13-genart-lc-gurbani-2025-11-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2025-11-26 IETF LC End Date: 2025-11-28 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This I-D is ready for BCP status but has some issues that must be addressed. These are detailed below. Major issues: 1. I do not get a sense of how many "moderator teams" there will be? Is there one IETF-wide moderator team? Or does each area have a moderator team? 2. Section 2: It was not entirely clear to me that *this* I-D was also establishing a "moderator team". I would make this explicit. Suggested change: s/This memo proposes a consistent approach to moderating the IETF's various public fora./This memo proposes a consistent approach to moderating the IETF's various public fora and outlines the process for establishing a moderator team/ Minor issues: 1. Section 2.1: s/IESG must not appoint a moderator who/IESG must not appoint a moderator an individual who is/ 2. Section 4.2: s/may be made only a year/may be made no earlier than a year/ Nits/editorial comments: 1. Section 2: s/previous model Appendix B.2 and/previous model (cf. Appendix B.2) and/