Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13
review-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13-genart-lc-gurbani-2025-11-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-11-28
Requested 2025-11-14
Authors Lars Eggert , Eliot Lear
I-D last updated 2026-02-27 (Latest revision 2026-02-09)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Tim Hollebeek (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Christian Amsüss (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -14 by Christian Amsüss (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wGg0HhUsqH_Fm9MtyJlGM1c3JDI
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2025-11-26
review-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13-genart-lc-gurbani-2025-11-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-13
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2025-11-26
IETF LC End Date: 2025-11-28
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This I-D is ready for BCP status but has some issues that must be
addressed.  These are detailed below.

Major issues:
1. I do not get a sense of how many "moderator teams" there will be?  Is there
one IETF-wide moderator team?  Or does each area have a moderator team? 2.
Section 2: It was not entirely clear to me that *this* I-D was also
establishing a "moderator team".  I would make this explicit.  Suggested
change: s/This memo proposes a consistent approach to moderating the IETF's
   various public fora./This memo proposes a consistent approach to moderating
   the IETF's various public fora and outlines the process for establishing a
   moderator team/

Minor issues:
1. Section 2.1: s/IESG must not appoint a moderator who/IESG must not appoint a
moderator an individual who is/ 2. Section 4.2: s/may be made only a year/may
be made no earlier than a year/

Nits/editorial comments:
1. Section 2: s/previous model Appendix B.2 and/previous model (cf. Appendix
B.2) and/