Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr-

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2009-09-08
Requested 2009-08-17
Authors JP Vasseur , George Swallow , Ina Minei
I-D last updated 2009-09-10
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Charlie Kaufman
Assignment Reviewer Charlie Kaufman
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Completed 2009-09-10
I am reviewing this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments. Feel free to forward to any appropriate

This document specifies a relatively minor clarification to RFC 3209, and as
far as I can tell that clarification has no security consequences (unless you
call non-interoperability because of different interpretations of the spec a
security issue).

Typos (maybe):

In sections 2.1 and 2.1, I found 2 “must”s, 2 “must not”s, 2 “should”s, and one
“may” that I believe should have been all caps per RFC 2119. I’ve never been
very good at that distinction, however, so the authors MIGHT have it right ;-)