Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label-01
review-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label-01-genart-lc-campbell-2014-11-03-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-11-03 | |
Requested | 2014-10-23 | |
Authors | John Scudder , Kireeti Kompella | |
I-D last updated | 2014-11-03 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Ben Campbell
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Scott G. Kelly (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Campbell |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2014-11-03 |
review-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label-01-genart-lc-campbell-2014-11-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label-01 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2014-11-03 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard. I have a few comments that might be worth considering if there are further updates, but should not block publication in any way. Major issues: None Minor issues: Am I correct in understanding that this draft deprecates all applicability of RFC 6790 to BGP, but lets stand its use in all other protocol contexts? If so, an explicit mention of that might be helpful. Nits/editorial comments: -- Section 2: Is the "subsequent to the publication of this document" disclaimer really needed? We update protocols all the time without offering date-based grandfather clauses. -- Section 3: There's a comma splice at the end of the paragraph. I suggest something to the effect of "... , _with_ reference _to_ this RFC."