Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05
review-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05-genart-lc-halpern-2014-04-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-05-06 | |
Requested | 2014-04-24 | |
Authors | Eric Osborne | |
I-D last updated | 2014-04-24 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Nevil Brownlee (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2014-04-24 |
review-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05-genart-lc-halpern-2014-04-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05 Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 24-April-2014 IETF LC End Date: 06-May-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standards RFC Major issues: N/A Minor issues: I believe that the description of when to use this EAG is slightly misleading. The text says that EAG is to be used "when a node wishes to advertise more than 32 colors for a link." I believe it is more accurate to say that it is to be used "when a node wishes to advertise colors for a link which are not represented in the first 32 bits of the color mask." The node may only wish to advertise colors 7 and 60, but that will require the EAG. Nits/editorial comments: N/A