Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02
review-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-03-13-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-02-24 | |
| Requested | 2014-02-13 | |
| Authors | Syed Kamran Raza , Sami Boutros , Luca Martini , Nicolai Leymann | |
| I-D last updated | 2014-03-13 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Dan Romascanu Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Tim Wicinski (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Magnus Nyström |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2014-03-13 |
review-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-03-13-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG . These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document clarifies label advertising behavior for LDP speakers. As such, it does not add any new functionality to LDP and hence the Sec Cons section looks fully adequate to me. -- -- Magnus