Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-09
review-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-09-secdir-telechat-kent-2013-08-07-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-08-13 | |
| Requested | 2013-07-25 | |
| Authors | Thomas Beckhaus , Bruno Decraene , Kishore Tiruveedhula , Maciek Konstantynowicz , Luca Martini | |
| I-D last updated | 2013-08-07 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Francis Dupont Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Stephen Kent (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Stephen Kent |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Stephen Kent |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-08-07 |
review-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-09-secdir-telechat-kent-2013-08-07-00
I re-reviewed this
document
as part of the security
directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being
processed by the IESG.
I compared the -08 and -09 version of this document, using the
IETF diff tool.
The authors responded to my concern that there were many
instances of what appeared to be normative text in Sections 3
and 4,
yet almost all instances of the words
“must” and “should” were lowercase. They removed all of the
words in question. I'm surprised by this outcome, but if the WG
chairs and ADs believe the resulting text is correct, with NO
normative terms, so be it.
The authors also revised the Security Considerations (Section 7)
text, addressing all of my comments.