Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-15

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-02-03
Requested 2015-01-22
Authors Rajiv Asati, Carlos Pignataro, Kamran Raza, Vishwas Manral, Rajiv Papneja
Draft last updated 2015-02-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -14 by Vijay Gurbani (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -15 by Vijay Gurbani (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay Gurbani
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-15-genart-telechat-gurbani-2015-02-04
Reviewed rev. 15 (document currently at 17)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2015-02-04


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-15
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Feb-04-2015
IETF LC End Date: Unknown
IESG Telechat date: Feb-05-2015

This document is ready as a Proposed Standard.

Major: 0
Minor: 1
Nits: 1

Minor: 1
1/ In Section 3, it appears that the second paragraph ("This rule ...
 updated rule:") is modifying rfc5036 to use the new text given
 below the quoted paragraph.

 However, I am not sure whether this is normative update or simply
 a suggestion.  In the second paragraph, the authors write that,
 "Hence, it is reasonable to say ..."  What does "reasonable" mean?
 Does it mean that rfc5036 is updated authoritatively with the
 suggested text or simply that rfc5036 text need not be updated but
 the text in this draft should be considered.

1/ I am not sure what portions of this draft update rfc6720...
 Perhaps item (8) in Section 1, but am not sure.


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{,} / vijay.gurbani at

  | Calendar: