Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-09-01
Requested 2017-08-18
Authors Alia Atlas , Kishore Tiruveedhula , Chris Bowers , Jeff Tantsura , IJsbrand Wijnands
I-D last updated 2017-09-01
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Tony Przygienda (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Peter E. Yee
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt-06-genart-lc-yee-2017-09-01
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready with Issues
Completed 2017-09-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt-06
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review Date: 2017-09-01
IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-01
IESG Telechat date: 2017-09-14

Summary:  The draft is ready for publication after correcting some minor issues.

Major issues:  None

Minor issues:

Page 3, section 3, IBR definition: the definition give here appears to be a
duplicate of the one given for IN.  Copy the correct definition from RFC 7812

Nits/editorial comments:

Page 3, section 1, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: append a comma after "e.g.".

Page 8, section 4.4., 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete duplicate "on".

Page 8, section 4.4, 2nd paragraph, 4th sentence: change comma after
"computations" to a period.

Page 9, section 5.1.1, 4th paragraph, 2nd sentence: the construction
"red(blue)" is used without defining what it means exactly.  From the context,
it isn't quite "red or blue".  An explanation of the meaning of this
construction should be given.  I'm assuming it means something like use "red"
in the sentence in all cases or use use "blue", but don't mix them.  There's
also red/blue used later in the document which muddies the point.

Page 10, 1st full paragraph, 2nd sentence: change "foll" to "follows:".

Page 11, section 5.2.2, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: delete the period after

Page 12, 1st paragraph, 1st sentence: consider deleting "how".

Page 13, 2nd paragraph after numbered list, 1st sentence: append "to" after

Section titles for 5.2, 5.3, and 7: append a space after "RFC" to separate it
from the number.  The spaceless form should only be used for references
enclosed in brackets.