Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-secdir-lc-salowey-2011-08-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2011-08-09
Requested 2011-06-17
Authors George Swallow , Nitin Bahadur , Kireeti Kompella
Draft last updated 2011-08-05
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Joseph A. Salowey
Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Michael Scharf
Assignment Reviewer Joseph A. Salowey
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-secdir-lc-salowey-2011-08-05
Completed 2011-08-05
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-secdir-lc-salowey-2011-08-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes modifications to LSP Ping to allow it to work with MPLS
tunnels.  It is possible that in some cases a provider may not want to disclose
information about tunnels.  The security considerations in the document
describe mechanisms to keep this information private.   In addition the
security considerations reference RFC 4379 which seems sufficient.

One nit: the first sentence in section 1 is missing a closing parenthesis.

Joe