Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05-secdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-12-11
Requested 2018-11-27
Authors Nobo Akiya , George Swallow , Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , John Drake , Mach Chen
I-D last updated 2018-12-11
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -06 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-12-11
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05-secdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-11-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready with comment

The described mechanism for LSP Multipath Ping is very clear. The Security
Consideration re-uses the description of RFC8029, which is very comprehensive.
It would be better if the draft describes how to prevent intermediate LSRs in
between the Initiating LSR and Responding LSR from mis-using the detailed link
information (e.g. forwarding to somewhere else).

Best Regards,
Linda Dunbar