Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05-secdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath
Requested rev. no specific revision
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-12-11
Requested 2018-11-27
Other Reviews Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Christer Holmberg
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Zitao Wang
Review State Completed
Reviewer Linda Dunbar
Review review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05-secdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-11
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/B1aFHrVqLOyemt_NYICL3CNxgvY
Reviewed rev. 05
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2018-12-11
Review completed: 2018-12-11

Review
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-05-secdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-11

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready with comment 

The described mechanism for LSP Multipath Ping is very clear. The Security Consideration re-uses the description of RFC8029, which is very comprehensive. 
It would be better if the draft describes how to prevent intermediate LSRs in between the Initiating LSR and Responding LSR from mis-using the detailed link information (e.g. forwarding to somewhere else).  

Best Regards, 
Linda Dunbar