Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06-secdir-telechat-dunbar-2019-03-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-03-12
Requested 2019-03-06
Authors Nobo Akiya , George Swallow , Stephane Litkowski , Bruno Decraene , John Drake , Mach Chen
I-D last updated 2019-03-08
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -06 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-03-08
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06-secdir-telechat-dunbar-2019-03-08-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The document provides the detailed explanation of SR-MPLS processing in
addition to RFC 8402. Since SR-MPLS are in the trusted domain, it is assumed
that there is no malicious attacks to the nodes for the data plane and control
plane.  RFC8402 already has the good description on the Security Consideration
for both SR-MPLS & SRv6.

Best Regards, 
Linda Dunbar