Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2015-03-04
IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-02?
IESG Telechat date: 2015-03-05
Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments.
-[Page 3], Section 2.1, Table "Registry Name: DS Flags.". Is there a reason bits 5-0 are listed as "Unassigned" and not "Reserved (MBZ)" ?, with Reference being RFC4379 Section 3.3.
-[Page 4], Section 2.3, Table "Registry Name: Pad Type.". RFC4379 did not reserve value 0. I could be wrong please double check.
-[Page 5], Section 2.4, Table "Registry Name: Interface and Label Stack Address Type.". Same as above, RFC4379 did not reserve value 0.
-[Page 2], Section 2.1, please put in parenthesis (DSMAP) and (DDMAP) right after when the terms are spelled out. The acronyms are use later on.