Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-03-02
Requested 2015-02-16
Authors Bruno Decraene, Nobo Akiya, Carlos Pignataro, Loa Andersson, Sam Aldrin
Draft last updated 2015-03-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2015-03-04
Reviewed rev. 02 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2015-03-04


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <>. 

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2015-03-04
IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-02?
IESG Telechat date: 2015-03-05

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments.

Minor issues:
-[Page 3], Section 2.1, Table "Registry Name: DS Flags.". Is there a reason bits 5-0 are listed as "Unassigned" and not "Reserved (MBZ)" ?, with Reference being RFC4379 Section 3.3. 

-[Page 4], Section 2.3, Table "Registry Name: Pad Type.". RFC4379 did not reserve value 0. I could be wrong please double check.

-[Page 5], Section 2.4, Table "Registry Name: Interface and Label Stack Address Type.". Same as above, RFC4379 did not reserve value 0.

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 2], Section 2.1, please put in parenthesis (DSMAP) and (DDMAP) right after when the terms are spelled out. The acronyms are use later on.

Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour