Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2015-03-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2015-03-02 | |
Requested | 2015-02-16 | |
Authors | Bruno Decraene , Nobo Akiya , Carlos Pignataro , Loa Andersson , Sam Aldrin | |
I-D last updated | 2015-03-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2015-03-04 |
review-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2015-03-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-02 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2015-03-04 IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-02? IESG Telechat date: 2015-03-05 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments. Minor issues: -[Page 3], Section 2.1, Table "Registry Name: DS Flags.". Is there a reason bits 5-0 are listed as "Unassigned" and not "Reserved (MBZ)" ?, with Reference being RFC4379 Section 3.3. -[Page 4], Section 2.3, Table "Registry Name: Pad Type.". RFC4379 did not reserve value 0. I could be wrong please double check. -[Page 5], Section 2.4, Table "Registry Name: Interface and Label Stack Address Type.". Same as above, RFC4379 did not reserve value 0. Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 2], Section 2.1, please put in parenthesis (DSMAP) and (DDMAP) right after when the terms are spelled out. The acronyms are use later on. Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com