Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04
review-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04-genart-lc-even-2013-12-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-12-10 | |
Requested | 2013-11-27 | |
Authors | Lizhong Jin , Frederic JOUNAY , IJsbrand Wijnands , Nicolai Leymann | |
I-D last updated | 2013-12-08 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Roni Even
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Roni Even (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Charlie Kaufman (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2013-12-08 |
review-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04-genart-lc-even-2013-12-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2013–12-8 IETF LC End Date: 2013-12–10 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an standard track RFC . Major issues: Minor issues: 1. In section 3.1 last paragraph “ If the peer has not advertised the corresponding capability, then label messages using the HSMP FEC Element SHOULD NOT be sent to the peer . “. Why use a SHOULD NOT and not MUSR NOT Nits/editorial comments: In section 2 for PTP IEEE1588 need a reference. There is a reference in the reference section but it is not used. Also the tictoc reference is not used.